Antwort auf den Beitrag "So, ist nun draußen (Kaby Lake)" posten:
Nickname		Passwort
Titel
Nachricht	>Und so wie es aussieht, ist der Zuwachs gegenüber dem 6700K absolut vernachlässigbar, teils schlägt sich der 6700k sogar besser. > >[http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/01/intel-core-i7-7700k-kaby-lake-review/] > >[i:[b:Intel Core i7-7700K Kaby Lake review: Is the desktop CPU dead?] > >With identical performance to Skylake, Intel brings desktop performance to a standstill. > >The Intel Core i7-7700K is what happens when a chip company stops trying. The i7-7700K is the first desktop Intel chip in brave new post-"tick-tock" world—which means that instead of major improvements to architecture, process, and instructions per clock (IPC), we get slightly higher clock speeds and a way to decode DRM-laden 4K streaming video. Huzzah. > >For the average consumer building or buying a new performance-focused PC, a desktop chip based on 14nm Kaby Lake remains the chip of choice—a total lack of competition at this level makes sure of that.] > >Auf Reddit geht gerade bezeichnenderweise dieses Bild hier um: > >[img:http://i.imgur.com/uOEbjUc.png] > >Ein Reddit User zusammenfassend dazu: > >[https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/5ly0zl/how_intel_must_feel_right_now/dbzdo7s/] > >[i:Kaby Lake is essentially Skylake with: > >1: a slightly improved 14nm process, reducing power consumption fractionally; >2: slightly higher clock speeds, which any overclocker worth his salt could get out of Skylake with the stock heatsink, never mind a good one; >3: an improved iGPU which most of us will never use; >4: a completely inadequate TIM under the heatspreader, ensuring it's in a permanent state of borderline overheating, even at stock speeds and with a good heatsink; >5: a brand-new, slightly increased price point; >6: almost imperceptibly lower IPC. Yes, someone did an A-B test at equal clock speeds, and Skylake won by a hair - consistently. > >It couldn't be more obvious that Kaby Lake is just Intel marking time while they struggle to get their 10nm process working.] > >***Diese Nachricht wurde von membran am 04.01.2017 11:28 bearbeitet.***
	Mailbenachrichtigung?